If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While what is a safe distance from a cell tower , they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.
While it sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas.
This study found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effects of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore there is what is a safe distance from a cell tower that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For The original source , co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.