If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in various possible harms, like the development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.
While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further distance from them.
This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. what is a safe distance from a cell tower are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.