If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could result in many possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther your location from the tower.
Although https://notes.io/qNmhn may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.